Message ID | 1411512908-19237-2-git-send-email-behanw@converseincode.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | b3f635ad6648d17178c3e2ab2f0a4823fcac1e83 |
Headers | show |
On Tuesday 23 September 2014 15:55:08 behanw@converseincode.com wrote: > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm-kona.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm-kona.c > @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_pltfm_data_kona = { > SDHCI_QUIRK_CAP_CLOCK_BASE_BROKEN, > }; > > -static struct __initconst of_device_id sdhci_bcm_kona_of_match[] = { > +static struct of_device_id const sdhci_bcm_kona_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "brcm,kona-sdhci"}, > { .compatible = "bcm,kona-sdhci"}, /* deprecated name */ > {} > Sorry for giving you trouble over such a simple patch (especially one that I have acked already), but I just noticed that this is not following the common style we use in the kernel. Almost everywhere in Linux, we use static const struct of_device_id sdhci_bcm_kona_of_match[] = { not static struct of_device_id const sdhci_bcm_kona_of_match[] = { AFAICT they behave in identical ways, but the first one seems easier to read for someone familiar with kernel code. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 09/24/14 02:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 23 September 2014 15:55:08 behanw@converseincode.com wrote: >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm-kona.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm-kona.c >> @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_pltfm_data_kona = { >> SDHCI_QUIRK_CAP_CLOCK_BASE_BROKEN, >> }; >> >> -static struct __initconst of_device_id sdhci_bcm_kona_of_match[] = { >> +static struct of_device_id const sdhci_bcm_kona_of_match[] = { >> { .compatible = "brcm,kona-sdhci"}, >> { .compatible = "bcm,kona-sdhci"}, /* deprecated name */ >> {} >> > Sorry for giving you trouble over such a simple patch (especially > one that I have acked already), but I just noticed that this is > not following the common style we use in the kernel. It's all good. It's not like you haven't saved me a tonne of time already! :) > Almost everywhere in Linux, we use > > static const struct of_device_id sdhci_bcm_kona_of_match[] = { > > not > > static struct of_device_id const sdhci_bcm_kona_of_match[] = { True enough. I put the const where I did to be in keeping with the intent of __initconst, making the array const instead of the contained type. > AFAICT they behave in identical ways, Indeed. For C in both cases the resulting array of struct of_device_id ends up in .rodata, so functionally equivalent. > but the first one seems > easier to read for someone familiar with kernel code. No worries. Happy to post a v3. Linus Walleij: Would you like me to respin the "gpio, bcm-kona, LLVMLinux: Remove use of __initconst" patch as well? Behan
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com> wrote: > On 09/24/14 02:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> but the first one seems >> easier to read for someone familiar with kernel code. > > No worries. Happy to post a v3. > > Linus Walleij: Would you like me to respin the "gpio, bcm-kona, LLVMLinux: > Remove use of __initconst" patch as well? No it's already applied. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm-kona.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm-kona.c index dd780c3..4bb06c8 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm-kona.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm-kona.c @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_pltfm_data_kona = { SDHCI_QUIRK_CAP_CLOCK_BASE_BROKEN, }; -static struct __initconst of_device_id sdhci_bcm_kona_of_match[] = { +static struct of_device_id const sdhci_bcm_kona_of_match[] = { { .compatible = "brcm,kona-sdhci"}, { .compatible = "bcm,kona-sdhci"}, /* deprecated name */ {}