Message ID | 1409919897-360-3-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 5 September 2014 13:24, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote: > From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@linaro.org> > > User mode emulation should never get interrupts and thus should not > use the system emulation exception handler function. Remove the reference, > and '#ifndef USER_MODE_ONLY' the function itself as well, so that we can add > system mode only functionality to it. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> > --- > target-arm/cpu64.c | 2 ++ > target-arm/helper-a64.c | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/target-arm/cpu64.c b/target-arm/cpu64.c > index aa42803959be..9f88b9f4eea0 100644 > --- a/target-arm/cpu64.c > +++ b/target-arm/cpu64.c > @@ -196,7 +196,9 @@ static void aarch64_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) > { > CPUClass *cc = CPU_CLASS(oc); > > +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) > cc->do_interrupt = aarch64_cpu_do_interrupt; > +#endif > cc->set_pc = aarch64_cpu_set_pc; > cc->gdb_read_register = aarch64_cpu_gdb_read_register; > cc->gdb_write_register = aarch64_cpu_gdb_write_register; > diff --git a/target-arm/helper-a64.c b/target-arm/helper-a64.c > index 2e9ef64786ae..89b913ee9396 100644 > --- a/target-arm/helper-a64.c > +++ b/target-arm/helper-a64.c > @@ -438,6 +438,8 @@ uint64_t HELPER(crc32c_64)(uint64_t acc, uint64_t val, uint32_t bytes) > return crc32c(acc, buf, bytes) ^ 0xffffffff; > } > > +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) > + > /* Handle a CPU exception. */ > void aarch64_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs) > { > @@ -512,3 +514,4 @@ void aarch64_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs) > env->pc = addr; > cs->interrupt_request |= CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB; > } > +#endif For consistency we need to not set do_interrupt in the arm_cpu_class_init() function too. (Then we'll have it be NULL in all cases, since v7m already guards its assignment with an ifdef.) thanks -- PMM
On 9 September 2014 17:25, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote: > On 5 September 2014 13:24, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote: >> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@linaro.org> >> >> User mode emulation should never get interrupts and thus should not >> use the system emulation exception handler function. Remove the reference, >> and '#ifndef USER_MODE_ONLY' the function itself as well, so that we can add >> system mode only functionality to it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@linaro.org> >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> >> --- >> target-arm/cpu64.c | 2 ++ >> target-arm/helper-a64.c | 3 +++ >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/target-arm/cpu64.c b/target-arm/cpu64.c >> index aa42803959be..9f88b9f4eea0 100644 >> --- a/target-arm/cpu64.c >> +++ b/target-arm/cpu64.c >> @@ -196,7 +196,9 @@ static void aarch64_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) >> { >> CPUClass *cc = CPU_CLASS(oc); >> >> +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) >> cc->do_interrupt = aarch64_cpu_do_interrupt; >> +#endif >> cc->set_pc = aarch64_cpu_set_pc; >> cc->gdb_read_register = aarch64_cpu_gdb_read_register; >> cc->gdb_write_register = aarch64_cpu_gdb_write_register; >> diff --git a/target-arm/helper-a64.c b/target-arm/helper-a64.c >> index 2e9ef64786ae..89b913ee9396 100644 >> --- a/target-arm/helper-a64.c >> +++ b/target-arm/helper-a64.c >> @@ -438,6 +438,8 @@ uint64_t HELPER(crc32c_64)(uint64_t acc, uint64_t val, uint32_t bytes) >> return crc32c(acc, buf, bytes) ^ 0xffffffff; >> } >> >> +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) >> + >> /* Handle a CPU exception. */ >> void aarch64_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs) >> { >> @@ -512,3 +514,4 @@ void aarch64_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs) >> env->pc = addr; >> cs->interrupt_request |= CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB; >> } >> +#endif > > For consistency we need to not set do_interrupt in > the arm_cpu_class_init() function too. (Then we'll > have it be NULL in all cases, since v7m already > guards its assignment with an ifdef.) > Would you prefer a single patch that does both? Or a followup patch?
On 9 September 2014 16:27, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote: > On 9 September 2014 17:25, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote: >> For consistency we need to not set do_interrupt in >> the arm_cpu_class_init() function too. (Then we'll >> have it be NULL in all cases, since v7m already >> guards its assignment with an ifdef.) >> > > Would you prefer a single patch that does both? > Or a followup patch? I think a single patch doing both will be OK. I don't care strongly either way. -- PMM
diff --git a/target-arm/cpu64.c b/target-arm/cpu64.c index aa42803959be..9f88b9f4eea0 100644 --- a/target-arm/cpu64.c +++ b/target-arm/cpu64.c @@ -196,7 +196,9 @@ static void aarch64_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) { CPUClass *cc = CPU_CLASS(oc); +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) cc->do_interrupt = aarch64_cpu_do_interrupt; +#endif cc->set_pc = aarch64_cpu_set_pc; cc->gdb_read_register = aarch64_cpu_gdb_read_register; cc->gdb_write_register = aarch64_cpu_gdb_write_register; diff --git a/target-arm/helper-a64.c b/target-arm/helper-a64.c index 2e9ef64786ae..89b913ee9396 100644 --- a/target-arm/helper-a64.c +++ b/target-arm/helper-a64.c @@ -438,6 +438,8 @@ uint64_t HELPER(crc32c_64)(uint64_t acc, uint64_t val, uint32_t bytes) return crc32c(acc, buf, bytes) ^ 0xffffffff; } +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) + /* Handle a CPU exception. */ void aarch64_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs) { @@ -512,3 +514,4 @@ void aarch64_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs) env->pc = addr; cs->interrupt_request |= CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB; } +#endif