Message ID | 3eb9a48877bbb208f3c1f3e121f8d78b1d306bd9.1402376112.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 10:27:12 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > Tegra's driver got updated a bit (00917dd cpufreq: Tegra: implement intermediate > frequency callbacks) and implements new 'intermediate freq' infrastructure of > core. Above commit updated comments about when to call > clk_prepare_enable(pll_x_clk) and Doug wasn't satisfied with those comments and > said this: > > > The "Though when target-freq is intermediate freq, we don't need to > > take this reference." makes me think that this function is actually > > called when target-freq is intermediate freq. I don't think it is, > > right? > > For better clarity just make that comment more explicit about when we call > tegra_target_intermediate(). > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> > Reported-and-reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > --- > Resend: Improved comment as suggested by Stephen. Applied to bleeding-edge, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c index a5fbc0a..8084c7f 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c @@ -71,9 +71,12 @@ static int tegra_target_intermediate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, /* * Take an extra reference to the main pll so it doesn't turn * off when we move the cpu off of it as enabling it again while we - * switch to it from tegra_target() would take additional time. Though - * when target-freq is intermediate freq, we don't need to take this - * reference. + * switch to it from tegra_target() would take additional time. + * + * When target-freq is equal to intermediate freq we don't need to + * switch to an intermediate freq and so this routine isn't called. + * Also, we wouldn't be using pll_x anymore and must not take extra + * reference to it, as it can be disabled now to save some power. */ clk_prepare_enable(pll_x_clk);